Chuck Langenberg's GangStalking Interview Before Being Murdered James Harken6,238 views Published on Jun 14, 2017 More on Chuck Langenbergs Murder : http://planet.infowars.com/resistance. .. “Gang Stalking” is, very likely, a disinformation term created by U.S. intelligence agencies. It refers to the intense, long-term, unconstitutional surveillance and harassment of a person who has been designated as a target by someone associated with America’s security industry. Such operations have nothing to do with criminal gangs. Official domestic counterintelligence operations of this type are – apparently – perpetrated by federal agents and intelligence/security contractors, sometimes with the support of state and local law enforcement personnel. Unofficial operations of this type are, apparently, perpetrated by private investigators and vigilantes – including former agents and cops, some of whom are members of the quasi-governmental Association of Law Enforcement Intelligence Units (LEIU...
If DHS would change its FOIA exclusion policy and be more transparent that would be more assuring to me that they are not involved in transgressions against the people of America and our government through gang stalking operations.
ReplyDeleteBelow are just one of DHS exclusion rules for FOIA request. DHS exclusion rules prevents them from being exposed if a possible criminal infraction could happen which tells me through out DHS and its Fusion Centers are engaged in unethical behavior at times. So this organization which is tied to Dept. Of Justice , FBI and many many other agencies are preventing Americans from knowing where they stand with our constitutional rights as Americans. I also believe I read somewhere they are also shielded from the Privacy Act of 1974 which gives way for serious information sharing and possible abuse through Dept. Of Homeland Securities Automated Targeting System.
(c)(1) Exclusion
The first of these novel provisions, known as the "(c)(1) exclusion," provides as follows:
Whenever a request is made which involves access to records described in subsection (b)(7)(A) and (A) the investigation or proceeding involves a possible violation of criminal law; and (B) there is reason to believe that (i) the subject of the investigation or proceeding is not aware of its pendency, and (ii) disclosure of the existence of the records could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings, the agency may, during only such time as that circumstance continues, treat the records as not subject to the requirements of this section.
Hello again, did you notice that all FOIA exclusions are conveniently
ReplyDeletetailor made in order to prevent exposure of an agency's criminal or
unconsitutional activities... ? All agencies use the basic FOIA format
and if you try any Article 78 poceedings, (New York Court procedure), the
Judges rule for the agencies...even if the agencies' procedural
improprieties in FOIA procedures, are obvious
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Google+ (First Amendment to the United
States Constitution) <****@**> wrote:
Yep its rigged its pretty much Dept. Of Justice and the FBI thought this out really good they are very slick and very smart cookies. Its like Americans are getting gag orders before they even try to ask for help to protect their constitutional rights.
ReplyDelete